• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
Answer card: GPT-5.6 is not one model but three tiers (Sol, Terra, Luna); Terra is half the price of GPT-5.5, Sol tops Terminal-Bench, and there is a new ultra subagent mode.

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5: what actually changed

3 September 2026
Answer card stating that Ternary Bonsai 2 27B, released by PrismML on 17 September 2026 under Apache 2.0, packs Qwen3.8 27B into 5.95 gigabytes at 1.72 bits per weight, keeps 98.2 percent of the 14-benchmark average, about 75 percent on SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench 2.1, and needs PrismML's llama.cpp fork to run.

Does Bonsai 2 27B really keep 98% of Qwen3.8 in 5.95 GB?

20 September 2026
Answer card stating that Jev 1.13 from TypeSafe AI is a decision model in early access since 15 September 2026 that returns typed probabilities instead of text, priced at 42 dollars per billion input tokens with output tokens free, answering in 70 to 500 milliseconds, with a 64K token request budget, text input only, and a documented list of things it does badly, including counting and dates.

Jev 1.13 bills $42 a billion tokens, and it can’t count

19 September 2026
Answer card stating that Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash launched on 17 September 2026 as an API only model on Alibaba Cloud Model Studio, taking text, images, audio and video in a 1M token context and returning text only, priced at 0.15 dollars per million input tokens for every modality and 0.47 dollars per million output tokens in the international regions, with no open weights published and the Qwen-Live Harness GitHub repository returning 404.

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash bills audio at $0.15 and ships no weights

18 September 2026
Answer card stating that on 15 September 2026 AWS said it is unable to restore access to resources and data hosted exclusively in the Middle East Bahrain region me-south-1 and in the mec1-az2 zone of the UAE region, because the damage spanned multiple Availability Zones and exceeded what multi-AZ services are designed to withstand.

AWS can’t restore me-south-1, six months after the drone strikes

17 September 2026
Answer card stating that Google released Gemini 3.8 Live and Gemini 3.8 Live Extended Thinking on 15 September 2026 at 3 dollars per million audio input tokens and 12 dollars out, that the thinking model requires asynchronous tools, and that Artificial Analysis scores it 82.6 on its Speech to Speech Quality Index.

Gemini 3.8 Live Extended Thinking rejects any tool that blocks

16 September 2026
Answer card summarising the Atria Dawn Preview release: 744B GLM-5.2 base, MIT licence, 1.5 TB BF16 and 756 GB FP8 checkpoints, 256K context, top on five of sixteen benchmark rows and trailing on SWE-bench Pro.

Atria Dawn Preview is 744B under MIT, and the BF16 weighs 1.5 TB

15 September 2026
Answer card stating that OpenAI released the Agents API in public beta on 10 September 2026 with no separate fee, billed through model tokens, tool calls and hosted sandbox time, with a choice of OpenAI hosted, self hosted or partner sandboxes, US only data residency and no Zero Data Retention support.

OpenAI’s Agents API has no fee, no ZDR and a one hour sandbox clock

14 September 2026
Answer card: Sakana Fugu Max at $2 and $6 per million tokens, Fugu Ultra v2 unchanged at $5 and $30, and Sakana saying Ultra v2 scores without Fable 5 or GPT-6 Astra in its pool.

Fugu Max costs $2 and $6 while Fugu Ultra v2 runs without Fable 5

13 September 2026
Answer card stating that DeepSeek released DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash on 10 September 2026 as a 552 billion parameter mixture of experts model with a new causal encoder decoder architecture that activates 8 billion parameters on input and 16 billion on output, with native vision, a one million token context and MIT licensed weights, that the API model name is now deepseek-flash at 0.15 dollars per million input tokens and 0.60 dollars per million output tokens off peak, and that DeepSeek announced V4 Pro would be routed to V4.1-Flash from 14 September and reversed that on 11 September.

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash arrived, and the V4 Pro retirement lasted a day

12 September 2026
Answer card stating that Cognition released SWE-2 on 10 September 2026, a coding model post-trained from Kimi K3, scoring 50.0 percent on FrontierCode 1.1 Main against 50.9 percent for Claude Fable 5.1 and 27.3 percent on Terminal-Bench 4 against 55.8 percent, available only inside Devin.

SWE-2 trails Fable 5.1 by one point, and by 28 on Terminal-Bench 4

11 September 2026
Answer card for Meta Muse, free to 100 million tokens a week then $20 a month, launched 8 September 2026 for United States adults only, running in a dedicated per user virtual machine.

Does Meta Muse do enough to earn your inbox and a card on file?

9 September 2026
Answer card stating that the public download pages for the VMware Virtual Disk Development Kit on developer.broadcom.com began returning 404 errors on 25 August 2026 with no announcement or deprecation notice, that Broadcom support tells customers the kit is no longer available for use or download, and that release lines 7.0.3.1, 8.x and 9.x are all affected.

Broadcom pulled VDDK 8.0 and 9.0, and the 404 is the only notice

8 September 2026
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Legal
Monday, September 21, 2026
  • Login
Packet Nebula
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Security
    • Network
    • Dev
    • Sysadmin
    • SEO
    • Email & DNS
  • Tools
    • Network tools: free, fast, no signup
    • Security tools: free, fast, no signup
    • Developer tools: free, fast, no signup
    • Sysadmin tools: free, fast, no signup
    • SEO tools: free, fast, no signup
    • Email & DNS tools: free, fast, no signup
  • Download
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Packet Nebula
No Result
View All Result
Home Dev

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5: what actually changed

by stephane
3 September 2026
in Dev
0
Answer card: GPT-5.6 is not one model but three tiers (Sol, Terra, Luna); Terra is half the price of GPT-5.5, Sol tops Terminal-Bench, and there is a new ultra subagent mode.
496
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

OpenAI started previewing GPT-5.6 in June 2026, and the first surprise is that GPT-5.6 isn't a model, it's three. The new naming splits the generation number from the capability tier, so you now choose between Sol, Terra and Luna: a top tier, a cheaper middle, and a lean one. Sol costs the same as GPT-5.5 did ($5 in, $30 out) and pushes coding to a new high on Terminal-Bench. Terra does most of that for half the price. The headline feature is ultra mode, which quietly spins up subagents to chew through hard tasks. It's a limited preview for now, not general release. Here's what actually changed from GPT-5.5, tier by tier, and whether it's worth moving.

The short answer

GPT-5.6 isn’t a single model. The new naming splits the generation (5.6) from the capability tier, so you pick Sol (top, same price as GPT-5.5), Terra (half the price, competitive), or Luna (lean and cheap). Sol tops Terminal-Bench for coding and adds an ultra mode that uses subagents. It’s a limited preview, so the real takeaway is the cheaper Terra tier, not a smarter flagship.

3 tiersSol, Terra, Luna
$2.50/$15Terra: half of Sol
Previewnot general release yet
Answer card: GPT-5.6 is three tiers (Sol, Terra, Luna); Terra is half the price of GPT-5.5, Sol tops Terminal-Bench, and there is a new ultra subagent mode.
The real news is the split into tiers, not a smarter top model.

GPT-5.6 is a tier system, and here are the prices

The thing to absorb before any benchmark: with GPT-5.6, OpenAI stopped shipping one model per version. The number now marks the generation, and three names mark durable capability tiers that can each advance on their own cadence. So you no longer ask “is GPT-5.6 good,” you ask “which tier.” Sol is the top, Terra the middle, Luna the lean one. Same brain family, three points on the cost-versus-power curve, and the one you pick is now a real decision rather than a footnote.

That’s the actual change from GPT-5.5, which was a single model at a single price. Everything else, the coding score and the new modes, sits on top of this.

Bar chart of GPT-5.6 output price per million tokens by tier: Luna $6, Terra $15, GPT-5.5 $30, GPT-5.6 Sol $30.
GPT-5.5 was one price. GPT-5.6 keeps the top the same and adds two cheaper tiers.

On output tokens, where the money goes: Sol is $5 in and $30 out, identical to GPT-5.5. Terra is $2.50 / $15, exactly half of Sol, and OpenAI describes it as competitive with GPT-5.5 while costing half as much. Luna is $1 / $6, the budget tier for high-volume or simpler work.

Read that the right way and the pricing story isn’t “GPT got more expensive,” it’s the opposite. The flagship held its price, and a near-flagship tier (Terra) now does most of the same work for half the bill. For anyone running GPT-5.5 in production today, Terra is the line item that should get your attention first.

What’s genuinely new, and what stayed unconfirmed

Beyond the tiers, a handful of real additions.

Coding moved up. GPT-5.6 Sol sets a new state of the art on Terminal-Bench 2.1, the benchmark for command-line workflows that need planning, iteration and tool coordination, which is to say agentic coding rather than single-shot snippets. OpenAI also reports better results on its GeneBench evaluation while spending fewer tokens than GPT-5.5, so part of the gain is efficiency, not just raw score.

Ultra mode is the headline. Instead of one agent grinding through a hard task, ultra mode spins up subagents to work in parallel and then combines what they find. It’s paired with a new “max” reasoning effort on Sol for the deepest single-pass thinking. Both are aimed squarely at long, multi-step jobs, the kind where GPT-5.5 would lose the thread halfway through.

Caching got predictable. GPT-5.6 adds explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life; cache writes bill at 1.25x the uncached input rate, and cache reads keep the 90% discount. Unglamorous, but if you send the same long system prompt thousands of times a day, controllable caching is a real cost lever.

One security-flavoured data point worth flagging, because it ties to a story we looked at recently: on OpenAI’s ExploitBench, Sol is reportedly competitive with Anthropic’s Mythos Preview while using roughly a third of the output tokens. AI offensive-security capability is becoming a headline number that labs now compete on openly.

Checklist of what is new in GPT-5.6: Terminal-Bench coding SOTA, ultra subagent mode, max reasoning effort, cheaper Terra and Luna tiers, predictable caching; still a limited preview.
The real additions, and the one caveat that matters: it’s still a preview.

Worth being honest about the gaps, because the hype outran the documentation. OpenAI hasn’t published a full model card or an independent, machine-readable benchmark package, so the scores above are early and partly OpenAI’s own framing. The context window and the knowledge cutoff aren’t officially disclosed; the 1.5 million token context and a May 2026 cutoff that circulated are leaks, not confirmed specs, so don’t build on them. And the whole thing is a limited preview through the API and Codex for select partners, with general availability only described as coming soon. Useful to plan around, too early to bet a product on.

Is it worth switching from GPT-5.5?

The honest decision tree.

If you run GPT-5.5 for general work at $5/$30, the obvious move once it opens up is to try Terra at $2.50/$15: half the price, billed as competitive. That’s the easy win and probably the reason most people will care about GPT-5.6 at all. If you need the absolute ceiling, or you’re building long agentic pipelines that would benefit from subagents, Sol plus ultra mode is the upgrade, at the same price GPT-5.5 charged. If cost dominates and the task is light, Luna at $1/$6 is the new floor.

Two caveats keep it grounded. It’s a preview, so this is a plan, not a migration. And every tier here’s closed and API-only; if what you actually want is a model you can run yourself, that’s a different shelf, and our breakdowns of GLM-5.2 and Qwen 3.7 Max vs GLM-5.2 cover the open and self-hostable side.

The story of GPT-5.6 isn’t a dramatically smarter top model. It’s that OpenAI unbundled “GPT” into tiers, handed you a cheaper-than-5.5 option and a subagent mode, and put it behind a preview gate. Choosing the right tier is the new skill.

Sources: OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Sol preview announcement, with specs, pricing and benchmark framing collated by Kingy and AIToolsReview, June 2026. Limited preview as of writing; treat unconfirmed specs as provisional.

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.6 better than GPT-5.5?

At the top end, modestly: GPT-5.6 Sol costs the same as GPT-5.5 ($5 in, $30 out) and sets a new state of the art on Terminal-Bench 2.1 for command-line coding, with a new ultra mode that uses subagents. The bigger change is structural: GPT-5.6 splits into three tiers, so the real win for most people is Terra at half the price rather than a smarter flagship.

What are Sol, Terra and Luna in GPT-5.6?

They’re capability tiers, not separate models. OpenAI changed the naming so the number (5.6) marks the generation while Sol, Terra and Luna mark durable tiers that can improve on their own schedule. Sol is the top tier ($5/$30 per 1M tokens), Terra the mid tier ($2.50/$15), Luna the lean one ($1/$6).

How much does GPT-5.6 cost vs GPT-5.5?

GPT-5.6 Sol is $5 input and $30 output per million tokens, identical to GPT-5.5. The new options are cheaper: Terra at $2.50/$15 (half of Sol, and OpenAI calls it competitive with GPT-5.5), and Luna at $1/$6. So GPT-5.6 mainly adds a cheaper-than-5.5 path rather than raising the top price.

What’s GPT-5.6 ultra mode?

Ultra mode goes beyond a single agent by spinning up subagents to work in parallel on a complex task, then combining the results. It’s paired with a new max reasoning effort on Sol for the deepest single-pass reasoning. Both target long, multi-step agentic and coding work.

Can I use GPT-5.6 right now?

Only partly. As of June 2026 it’s a limited preview through the API and Codex for select partners, with broader availability described as coming soon. OpenAI also hasn’t published a full model card or an independent benchmark package, so treat the numbers as early and unconfirmed, and don’t migrate production to it yet.

Tags: aiarticlebenchmarksgptllmopenai
Share198Tweet124
stephane

stephane

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Answer card: Proton Lumo 2.0 is private by policy, not by locality. Saved history is locked so even Proton cannot read it, but the prompt is decrypted on a Proton EU server to answer it, then forgotten.

Proton Lumo 2.0 review: how private is it, really?

3 September 2026
The Agentic Coding section of the official Hy4 preview benchmark appendix published by Tencent, a table comparing Hy3 and Hy4 preview against DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, Qwen 3.8 Max, GLM 5.3, Kimi K3, GPT 5.6 Sol and Claude Opus 5 across SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-bench Pro, DeepSWE, three SWE Atlas tasks, SWE-Marathon, Terminal-Bench 2.1, NL2Repo-Bench, CyberGym, ProgramBench, PostTrainBench and Harbor-Index.

Tencent’s 770B Hy4 tops one benchmark row in 46

3 September 2026
Answer card: Qwen 3.7 Max is API-only and cannot run locally yet; the open Qwen models (Qwen 3.6 27B, qwen3:8b to 32b) run offline via Ollama.

Qwen 3.7 local: what you can actually run offline

22 June 2026
Answer card: JWTs are not encrypted, anyone can read them; the signature proves who issued the token, not who may read it.

Are JWTs encrypted? No, and the difference will bite you

0
Answer card: a random 8 character password falls in under 2 hours offline, while 16 random characters hold for 1.4 trillion years at the same speed.

How long does it take to crack a password in 2026?

0
Answer card: three DNS records decide if your mail lands or bounces; SPF lists allowed senders, DKIM signs messages, DMARC sets the failure policy.

SPF, DKIM and DMARC explained: the records your email needs

0
Answer card stating that Ternary Bonsai 2 27B, released by PrismML on 17 September 2026 under Apache 2.0, packs Qwen3.8 27B into 5.95 gigabytes at 1.72 bits per weight, keeps 98.2 percent of the 14-benchmark average, about 75 percent on SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench 2.1, and needs PrismML's llama.cpp fork to run.

Does Bonsai 2 27B really keep 98% of Qwen3.8 in 5.95 GB?

20 September 2026
Answer card stating that Jev 1.13 from TypeSafe AI is a decision model in early access since 15 September 2026 that returns typed probabilities instead of text, priced at 42 dollars per billion input tokens with output tokens free, answering in 70 to 500 milliseconds, with a 64K token request budget, text input only, and a documented list of things it does badly, including counting and dates.

Jev 1.13 bills $42 a billion tokens, and it can’t count

19 September 2026
Answer card stating that Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash launched on 17 September 2026 as an API only model on Alibaba Cloud Model Studio, taking text, images, audio and video in a 1M token context and returning text only, priced at 0.15 dollars per million input tokens for every modality and 0.47 dollars per million output tokens in the international regions, with no open weights published and the Qwen-Live Harness GitHub repository returning 404.

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash bills audio at $0.15 and ships no weights

18 September 2026
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Legal

Copyright © 2026 Stephane Cardon.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Security
    • Network
    • Dev
    • Sysadmin
    • SEO
    • Email & DNS
  • Tools
    • Network tools: free, fast, no signup
    • Security tools: free, fast, no signup
    • Developer tools: free, fast, no signup
    • Sysadmin tools: free, fast, no signup
    • SEO tools: free, fast, no signup
    • Email & DNS tools: free, fast, no signup
  • Download
  • About

Copyright © 2026 Stephane Cardon.